Wednesday June 14th.
Does anyone else have a problem with the results? I permanently wear a Fitbit which gave me a time of 43:33. My Garmin also gave a time of 43:33. My official time is half a minute slower. The person who finished in front of me was given a time of 43:33. It looks like a misalignment of names and times.
We also have two Gail Hills, which some might regard as a luxury, but sadly no Sally Gilliver.
54 | Paul Norris | 35:30 | |
63 | Paul Garnett | 36:25 | |
72 | Janine Ellis | 36:49 | |
87 | Gareth Trimble | 37:48 | |
99 | Sally Price | 38:11 | |
112 | Gail Hill | 38:47 | |
114 | Mark Crossland | 38:54 | |
130 | Nicky Mowat | 39:53 | |
142 | John Porteus | 40:45 | |
157 | Catrina Marshall | 41:34 | |
173 | Gail Hill | 42:43 | |
175 | Janet Wyles | 42:41 | |
187 | Ian Ashcroft | 44:02 | |
196 | Julie Lucas | 44:59 | |
198 | Simon Fenton | 45:09 | |
225 | Sue Strang | 47:03 | |
231 | Don Bullough | 47:50 | |
242 | El;speth Gibson | 49:26 | |
243 | Chris Cannon | 49:48 |
I think the Gail Hill that finished in 38:47 is a rogue entry 🙂 (only joking Gail). My official time is 5 seconds slower than I recorded Ian, so maybe there was some misalignment. [Mark]
Hi Ian
My Garmin said 38.05 which would have put me top in Group three. On a more serious note I had 40.31 so the official time was 14 secs slower.
PS I thought Gail was unique??
I think it is a misalignment of names and times. My Garmin recorded 36.13, which was the time given to the runner in front of me.
My Garmin is 41.22, faster than recorded but doesn’t affect position, providing Sally is inserted ahead of me.
Lol the one and only ‘Gail Hill’ had 38.45 on her watch
Lol the one and only ‘Gail Hill’ had 38.45 on her watch :-))